Reading this book is a little like being handed a deck of cards someone has already shuffled and told: this is the order now, get used to it. Billy Pilgrim doesn't experience his life start to finish. He experiences it in whatever sequence his mind serves it up, a childhood swimming lesson followed by his own death decades later followed by a night in a POW camp followed by an alien zoo on the planet Tralfamadore. Vonnegut commits to this structure completely, refusing to smooth it into a conventional flashback pattern, and the effect isn't confusion so much as vertigo, the sense that time has stopped being a straight road and become something closer to a room you can wander into at any door.
The joke at the center of the book, if you can call it that, is the phrase that follows every death in the novel, however small or enormous: so it goes. It shows up after a champagne bottle goes flat and after a city burns to the ground, and the flatness of the response to both is the entire argument. Vonnegut isn't being glib. He's building a kind of numbness on the page that mirrors what happens to a person who has actually watched a city die, and by the fortieth or fiftieth repetition, that phrase stops sounding like a shrug and starts sounding like grief with nowhere left to go.
The Dresden material is the book's real center of gravity, even though Vonnegut approaches it sideways for most of the novel. He was there, a young American POW, when Allied firebombing leveled the city and killed tens of thousands of civilians in a single night, and that firsthand knowledge gives the quieter, more restrained passages about the bombing far more force than any of the louder science fiction sequences. The aliens, the time travel, the domed zoo enclosure where Billy is put on display with a former film star named Montana Wildhack: all of it reads less like actual science fiction than like the coping mechanism of a mind that needs somewhere else to go. Kilgore Trout, Vonnegut's recurring hack science fiction writer, shows up here too, and his cheap pulp paperbacks become a strange kind of scripture for Billy, proof that other people have also tried to build frameworks sturdy enough to hold what happened to him.
The prose itself is short, plain, almost deadpan, built from simple declarative sentences that rarely announce their own cleverness even when they're doing something genuinely inventive. That plainness is deliberate and it's also the book's biggest asset: dense subject matter delivered in a voice that never postures or over-explains. A few readers have found the tonal whiplash, tragedy and slapstick sitting one paragraph apart, hard to settle into, and there's a real argument that the book asks you to hold two incompatible registers at once without ever resolving which one is the true one. I'd say that discomfort is the point rather than a flaw, but it's fair to walk in expecting it.
What holds the whole strange structure together is Billy himself, a passive, slightly ridiculous, deeply sympathetic man who never becomes a hero and never really tries to. He survives the war, gets rich as an optometrist, marries, has kids, and the novel treats all of that ordinary American life with the same flat wonder it gives the bombing and the aliens, as if nothing that happens to a person after real catastrophe can ever again be sorted neatly into important and unimportant. That refusal to rank experience, to treat a Tralfamadorian zoo enclosure and a Dresden basement and a suburban living room as more or less the same kind of strange, is Vonnegut's sharpest trick and his saddest one.
Why you should read
- Readers who want anti-war fiction with real formal daring
- Fans of dark, deadpan humor next to genuine tragedy
- Anyone drawn to nonlinear, fragmented storytelling
- Readers interested in trauma rendered through structure, not just plot
What to expect
- A short, fast read told out of chronological order
- Plain, declarative prose with recurring refrains
- Sudden tonal shifts between slapstick and horror
- Science fiction elements that double as coping mechanisms
By the time the novel arrives back at Dresden for good, the reader has been so thoroughly disoriented by the leaps in time that the horror lands with an odd, delayed force, the way a piece of bad news sometimes needs a minute to actually register. Vonnegut never tells you how to feel about any of it. He just keeps saying so it goes, and lets that phrase do more work than a hundred pages of description could.